ArticleDysphagia2025
A Letter to the Editor on Presbyphagia: A Conceptual Analysis of Contemporary Proposals and their Influences on Clinical Diagnosis.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The author identified three main operational definitions of presbyphagia in the specialized literature: (1) changes in healthy older people's swallowing, (2) a swallowing disorder compensated by physiological reserves, and (3) a synonym of dysphagia. As the author stated in the conclusion, presbyphagia should be considered an etiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). However, significant methodological flaws were found, including selecting only one person to screen and analyze articles in the systematic review, not using any keywords or MeSH terms in the search, not presenting a search strategy, limiting the search term to "presbyphagia", and omitting details about screening, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. The operational definitions describe that aging inherently causes swallowing impairment. However, they disregard age-related changes without significant functional impact, as found by a previous study, reviewed in the current research, but analyzed inconsistently by the author. This recent study showed that presbyphagia is the opposite of OD, framing both the "negative" aspects of swallowing and the "compensatory positives" as natural consequences of aging, consistent with the World Health Organization's concept of intrinsic capacity. This perspective positions aging as an adaptive process-not a disease or cause of disease-, although it may increase vulnerability due to cumulative factors. Since OD is a symptom, attributing it to aging frames aging itself as a disease, contradicting current geriatrics and gerontology paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40172667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.