ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Percutaneous pelvic ring fracture reduction using an external fixator: a technical trick and case series.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The anatomical bone corridor study of schanz screw placement in adolescent pelvic ring fractures via three-dimensional CT.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelvic ring and acetabular fractures pose significant morbidity and mortality risks due to substantial haemorrhage and internal organ injury. Many percutaneous reduction techniques involve manipulating the injured side while stabilizing the uninjured side, often requiring specific or costly equipment. This article presents a technique for creating a pelvic reduction frame using a standard external fixator.
methodWe included surgical pelvic ring fractures between 2018 and 2022. Pelvic reduction was achieved using an external fixator (Hoffmann III, Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA). Reduction quality was assessed according to the technique described by Lefaivre et al., based on the following criteria: mean asymmetry (mm), mean deformity index (mm), and mean maximum horizontal or vertical displacement (mm).
results15 patients (10 men, 5 women, mean age 35 years) underwent surgical treatment for pelvic fractures using an external fixator and percutaneous fixation. Mean operative time was 130 min (range, 80-276). Postoperative imaging showed a mean maximum displacement of 5.4 mm and a mean asymmetry of 3.7 mm, with excellent or good reductions in 11 cases.
conclusionThis system uses widely available equipment and enables the benefits of percutaneous techniques, but surgical expertise remains the key to success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.