Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172649›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Stefan Huber-Wagner, Rainer Braunschweig, Daniela Kildal, Dan Bieler, Barbara Prediger, Miriam Hertwig, Charlotte Kugler, Stefan Reske, Thomas Wurmb, Gerhard Achatz and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of a comprehensive trauma pathway on workflow and clinical processes in a level III trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stefan Huber-Wagner *Department of Trauma Surgery, Schwäbisch Hall Diakonie Hospital, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Rainer Braunschweig *Institut of Radiology, University Erlangen, Germany, Member of the Board of the Working Group On Musculoskeletal Imaging (AG MSK) of the German Radiological Society, Berlin, Germany.
Daniela Kildal *Department of Radiology, Upper Valais Hospital Centre (Brig), Brig, Switzerland.
Dan Bieler *Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. dan.bieler@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Barbara PredigerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Miriam HertwigInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Charlotte KuglerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan ReskeDepartment of Radiology, Heinrich Braun Hospital, Zwickau, Germany.
Thomas WurmbDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Würzburg University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Gerhard AchatzDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Bundeswehr Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Benedikt FriemertBundeswehr Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Carsten SchoenebergDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to develop new evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for imaging strategies in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.

methodsMEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to August 2021. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room, randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and comparative registry studies; comparison of interventions for imaging strategies; patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.

resultsTwenty-one studies with a total of 55,227 patients were identified. There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). Relevant topics were sonographic imaging of the chest and abdomen (n = 8 studies), X-ray of the chest (n = 1), indications for whole-body computed tomography (n = 6), CT scanner location (n = 1), whole-body computed tomography in haemodynamically unstable patients (n = 3), and prehospital sonography (n = 2). There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). One new recommendation was developed, six were modified. All achieved strong consensus.

conclusionWhile extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma should be performed for diagnostic purposes after blunt and/or penetrating thoracic and/or abdominal trauma as part of the primary survey in the resuscitation room, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) gains highest importance as part of the diagnostic procedures for severely injured patients. WBCT with a trauma-specific protocol must be performed in a timely manner if the patient does not require an immediate intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging can be indicated as a further primary diagnostic tool for specific conditions. Two studies were judged to be of low risk of bias in all domains. The risk of selection bias was high in two studies and unclear in seven studies.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicResuscitationTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyComputed tomographyDiagnostic imagingImaging strategyPolytrauma guidelineSeverely injuredWhole-body CT

Identifiers

PMID40172649
PMCPMC11965254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.