ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Temporal dynamics and task-dependent neural mechanisms in facial symmetry processing.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although symmetry has long been recognized as a critical feature in facial perception, relatively little research has examined the temporal dynamics of the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of facial symmetry. To address this gap, the present study employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate these dynamics. Using a classic stimulus-response paradigm, behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) data were collected from 27 participants under different task conditions. The results revealed that the neural mechanisms of symmetrical face processing exhibit not only distinct temporal dynamics but also partial automation. Specifically, symmetrical faces elicited larger N170 and later Sustained Posterior Negativity (SPN) amplitudes compared to asymmetrical faces in explicit symmetry tasks. The N170 component likely reflects an early stage of visual-perceptual processing, oriented toward aesthetic appraisal and face recognition, whereas the SPN reflects a mid-to-late stage of sustained integration involved in symmetry processing. These findings suggest that facial symmetry processing is a dynamic, strategy-driven process, with different priorities emerging at distinct stages of neural activity.Additionally, in the implicit task, symmetrical faces elicited larger P300 amplitudes compared to asymmetrical faces, suggesting a degree of automaticity in the processing of facial symmetry. N170 and P300 components were also observed when processing emoji stimuli in the explicit symmetry task, indicating that face-like materials engage similar neural mechanisms under certain conditions. Taken together, this study not only provides direct evidence of the neural mechanisms underlying facial symmetry processing in explicit tasks but also underscores the complexity and specificity of this process, as revealed through implicit tasks and the use of face-like stimuli such as emojis. These findings offer valuable insights into the temporal dynamics of the neural mechanisms involved in facial symmetry processing, advancing our understanding of its nuanced and multifaceted nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40172618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.