The combined effects of artificial gravity, temperature, and hypoxia on haemodynamic responses and limb blood flow.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Haemodynamic responses to head-up tilt versus lower-body negative pressure in type 1 diabetes.Experimental physiology · 2026
   Trial
2. Artificial gravity during prolonged bed rest preserves resting metabolic rate but not muscle function: Evidence from the BRACE study.The Journal of physiology · 2026
   Trial

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as