ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025
Within-trial data borrowing for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) is a complex trial design that involves randomizing a single participant multiple times in a sequential manner. This results in the branching nature of a SMART, which represents several distinct groups defined by different combinations of treatments, response statuses, etc. A SMART can then answer various scientific questions of interest, eg, the optimal dynamic treatment regime (DTR) for treating a chronic illness, what intervention to offer first, and what intervention to offer to nonresponders (or suboptimal responders). However, the analysis of a SMART can suffer from low precision, as the potentially widely branching structure can lead to reduced sample sizes in some groups of interest. In this paper, we propose a novel analysis method for a SMART in which dynamic borrowing is used to borrow strength across groups with similar expected outcomes, thus providing increased precision for the estimation of the expected outcomes of DTRs. We apply our method to a SMART evaluating various weight loss strategies using a binary endpoint of clinically significant weight loss and show by simulation that our method can improve the precision of the estimated expected outcome of a DTR, aid in the identification of the optimal DTR, and produce a clustering analysis of DTRs embedded in a SMART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.