Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172579›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2025

Where Do Children Look When Watching Videos With Same-Language Subtitles?

Anastasiya Lopukhina, Walter J B van Heuven, Rebecca Crowley, Kathleen Rastle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anastasiya LopukhinaDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-1644
Walter J B van HeuvenSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham.
Rebecca CrowleyDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.
Kathleen RastleDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.ORCID 0000-0002-3070-7555

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influential campaigns in the United Kingdom and the United States have argued that same-language television subtitles may help children learn to read. In this study, we investigated the extent to which primary-school children pay attention to and read subtitles and whether this is related to their reading proficiency. We tracked the eye movements of 180 British children in Years 1 to 6 who watched videos with and without subtitles. Results showed that attention to subtitles was associated with reading proficiency: Superior readers were more likely to look at subtitles than less proficient readers and spent more time on them. When children looked at words in the subtitles, they showed evidence of reading them. We conclude that some degree of reading fluency may be necessary before children pay attention to subtitles. However, by the third or fourth year of reading instruction, most children read sufficiently quickly to follow same-language subtitles and potentially learn from them.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsLanguageReadingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleTelevisionUnited Kingdomclosed captionseye trackingprimary-school childrenreadingsame-language subtitles

Identifiers

PMID40172579
PMCPMC13428831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.