ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025
Cross-validation-based sequential design for stochastic models.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-validation-based sequential design for stochastic models.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Preface to the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex numerical models are increasingly being used in healthcare and epidemiology. To represent the complex features, modellers often make the decision to include stochastic behaviour where repeated runs of the model with identical inputs produce different outputs. When computational constraints limit the number of model runs and replications, heteroscedastic Gaussian processes can be used as a fast surrogate, allowing for efficient emulation of varying noise levels across the input space. The accuracy of any emulator is greatly dependent on the design of the training data, where sequential design algorithms increase the number of design points iteratively based on predefined criteria. For stochastic models, the design problem is more challenging due to the possibility of replicates at design points. This article develops a new sequential design method for stochastic models which scales well in high-dimensional input spaces. We build upon an existing method for deterministic models using an expected squared leave-one-out error criterion that balances exploration and replication. We compare our approach with existing sequential design methods as well as applying it to an agent-based model and a COVID-19 model. Results demonstrate that the proposed method performs well in noisy environments, offering a scalable alternative to existing methods.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.