Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172553›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025

Simulation-based inference of the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated and under-reported disease incidence time series data.

Isaac Ogi-Gittins, Nicholas Steyn, Jonathan Polonsky, William S Hart, Mory Keita, Steve Ahuka-Mundeke, Edward M Hill, Robin N Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preface to the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isaac Ogi-GittinsMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nicholas SteynDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jonathan PolonskyGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
William S HartMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mory KeitaWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Steve Ahuka-MundekeNational Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Edward M HillCivic Health Innovation Labs and Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2992-2004
Robin N ThompsonMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8545-5212

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research UnitWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During infectious disease outbreaks, the time-dependent reproduction number ([Formula: see text]) can be estimated to monitor pathogen transmission. In previous work, we developed a simulation-based method for estimating [Formula: see text] from temporally aggregated disease incidence data (e.g. weekly case reports). While that approach is straightforward to use, it assumes implicitly that all cases are reported and the computation can be slow when applied to large datasets. In this article, we extend our previous approach and develop a computationally efficient simulation-based method for estimating [Formula: see text] in real-time accounting for both temporal aggregation of incidence data and under-reporting (with a fixed reporting probability per case). Using simulated data, we show that failing to consider stochastic under-reporting can lead to inappropriately precise estimates, including scenarios in which the true [Formula: see text] value lies outside inferred credible intervals more often than expected. We then apply our approach to data from the 2018 to 2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), again exploring the effects of case under-reporting. Finally, we show how our method can be extended to account for temporal variations in reporting. Given information about the level of case reporting, our framework can be used to estimate [Formula: see text] during future outbreaks with under-reported and temporally aggregated case data.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 2)'.

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberCommunicable DiseasesDisease OutbreaksComputer SimulationHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansIncidenceStochastic ProcessesTime Factorsapproximate Bayesian computationEbola virus diseaseinfectious disease outbreakpublic health measuresstochastic simulationstime-dependent reproduction number

Identifiers

PMID40172553
PMCPMC12105791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.