Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172545›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2025

Syndromic approaches for sexually transmitted infections: added value of molecular diagnosis.

Onya Opota, Gilbert Greub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Onya OpotaInstitute of Microbiology.
Gilbert GreubInstitute of Microbiology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a significant global health concern, with many cases going undiagnosed due to asymptomatic infections. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as culture and serology, have limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time. Molecular diagnostics, particularly PCR-based approaches, offer significant advantages, including improved detection rates and the potential for syndromic testing. This review examines the role of syndromic PCR diagnostics in improving STI detection and management. RECENT

findingsRecent studies highlight the utility in detecting common STIs, such as Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and Trichomonas vaginalis , as well as emerging pathogens. PCR-based syndromic panels allow for the simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens from a single sample, improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Syndromic PCR approaches streamline diagnosis, aid in early detection, and support efficient treatment, addressing both common and emerging infections. SUMMARY: Syndromic PCR diagnostics streamline STI detection, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. They enable faster, more accurate, and comprehensive diagnosis, leading to targeted treatment and improved patient outcomes. Expanding syndromic panels to include emerging pathogens and ensuring cost-effective implementation remain key areas for future research.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSexually Transmitted DiseasesHumansPCRsexually transmitted infectionsyndromic diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID40172545
PMCPMC11970614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.