Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172527›Full record

SynthesisTranslational vision science & technology2025

An Emerging Global Threat of Mycotic Keratitis Caused by Uncommon Fungal Species: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Megha Gautam, Babu Lal, Smita Patel, Rajiv R Mohan, Arivarasan Barathi, Nikita Yadav, Sunil Kumar Verma, Richa Nyodu, Ananyan Sampath, Darshna Koshti and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Megha GautamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Bhopal, India.
Babu LalTrauma and Emergency Medicine Department, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Smita PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, LN Medical College and J K Hospital, Bhopal, India.
Rajiv R MohanDepartments of Ophthalmology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Arivarasan BarathiDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College, Chennai, India.
Nikita YadavDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Sunil Kumar VermaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Richa NyoduDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Ananyan SampathDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Darshna KoshtiDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Bhavana SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze epidemiological characteristics, clinical spectrum, and treatment outcome of mycotic keratitis (MK) caused by uncommon species. Methods: The systematic review in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines has been registered on "PROSPERO" (CRD42023410825), whereas the systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar on uncommon MK from January 1963 to March 2023. The main keywords for the literature search comprised: "mycotic keratitis," "fungal keratitis," "keratomycosis," "oculomycosis," "uncommon," "rare," "emerging," "atypical," "unusual," and various combinations of it. Results: The study identified a pool of 13,662 articles. Five hundred sixty-six studies were deemed suitable, and 186 studies met the inclusion criteria to ascertain the pooled prevalence. A total of 154 uncommon fungal species/genera were identified among 61 countries. Australia exhibited the highest pooled prevalence, whereas India reported the maximum number of cases, genera, and species. Clinical presentation varied from mild to severe disease with unequivocal response to standard therapeutic regimes. Microbiologically proven species with reported sensitivity had better visual and structural outcomes. Conclusions: The study provides the first-ever global prevalence estimate of MK caused by uncommon species, estimating 154 fungal genera/species with varying severity, assuming that several culture-negative cases with specific predispositions would also qualify as cases of MK. Microbiologically proven species with reported sensitivity have better visual and structural outcomes. Cases that fail to respond to standard therapy should be re-evaluated for uncommon species with a high index of suspicion. Prompt diagnosis with culture and sensitivity analysis, PCR or in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)-based test and timely treatment remain the most important factors in salvaging visual and structural function. Translational Relevance: This review catalogues the epidemiological, clinical, and morphological traits of rare fungi implicated in atypical MK and also provides a global prevalence estimate. Further, it emphasizes the role of implementation of specialized diagnostic techniques and collaborative efforts to combat the visual disability stemming from afflictions due to rare or atypical fungal species. Information on continent and country wise prevalence of atypical species would be helpful in appropriate management of such cases, in event of inconclusive diagnosis and consequent suboptimal response to treatment.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, FungalFungiKeratitisAntifungal AgentsGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID40172527
PMCPMC11968006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.