ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Discontinuation of Long-Term Orthokeratology: A 2-Year Prospective Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of orthokeratology with different back optic zone diameters on corneal biomechanics and myopia control: a 1-year randomized, double-blind, self-controlled study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- One-year effects of orthokeratology lens wear on objective visual quality and corneal densitometry in adolescents with myopia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Long-term observation of the endothelium morphology and corneal thickness in myopic adolescents treated with orthokeratology: a 10-year retrospective study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the long-term changes in the corneal biomechanical properties (CBPs) during and shortly after orthokeratology (ortho-k). We further explored the associations between selected CBPs and the effectiveness of ortho-k in mitigating axial elongation in patients with myopia. Methods: This prospective 25-month follow-up study included children ages 8 to 16 years with low to moderate myopia undergoing ortho-k treatment. They underwent 24 months of ortho-k followed by 1-month discontinuation. Their ocular biometric parameters and CBPs were monitored throughout the study. Axial length was measured at baseline, at 1 month, and then every 6 months after ortho-k treatment. Results: Dynamic changes in CBPs were observed during the 24-month ortho-k treatment. Parameters such as the stiffness parameter at the first applanation time (SP-A1), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure, and Ambrósio's relational horizontal thickness showed initial reductions. After the 1-month discontinuation, most CBPs returned to baseline levels, except biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and SP-A1. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that differences in the deformation amplitude ratio or SP-A1 during the initial 2 weeks independently predicted axial elongation at 1 and 2 years after treatment initiation. Conclusions: Long-term ortho-k treatment may lead to sequential variations in CBPs; however, most of these variations may be reversed within 1 month of discontinuation. Further, changes in the deformation amplitude ratio or SP-A1 values during the early stages of treatment may predict subsequent axial elongation. Translational Relevance: This study highlights the value of corneal biomechanics in guiding myopia control during orthokeratology treatment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.