ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Quality of outpatient nursing care: a scoping review.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to map national and international scientific literature on the quality of outpatient nursing care. a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Collaboration, conducted across 12 databases and repositories. Only original articles evaluating the quality of outpatient nursing care were included. No restrictions were applied regarding time, methodology, or language. Data were mapped and organized through thematic and statistical descriptions of the articles. This review was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. a total of 45 studies published between 1984 and 2021 were identified, resulting in 17 quality indicators for outpatient nursing care, grouped according to Donabedian's triad: four for structure, seven for process, and six for outcomes. The predominant area of care was oncology. Among the analyzed studies, 55.3% focused on patients. The most frequently cited indicators were continuing health education, service organization, communication, care coordination, and the nursing process. the limited number of studies in this field, compared to other areas of nursing, highlights the underexploitation of the topic both nationally and internationally. Additionally, the diversity of identified indicators underscores the lack of standardization in these data.
background(1) Few studies address the evaluation of outpatient nursing care quality.
background(2) Quality indicators identify challenges in healthcare services.
background(3) Publications on outpatient nursing care quality have increased since 2000.
background(4) Most of the evaluated studies focused on outpatient patients.
background(5) The most frequently cited quality indicator in the studies was Continuing Health Education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.