ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy in a southern Brazil hospital.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of photon radiotherapy on microleakage and microhardness of nanohybrid resin composite restoration: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dose-Dependence Relationship Between Radiotherapy and Oral Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Retrospective Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the main oral adverse effects and their relationship with dental care before radiotherapy (RT) and combined RT and chemotherapy (RT+CT). Additionally, we assessed the association of other risk factors with the development of these adverse effects. This paper is a retrospective cross-sectional analytical study of data from medical records of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who underwent RT or RT+CT attended at the stomatology unit in a southern Brazil hospital. The records of 78 patients with HNC were accessed. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, cancer treatment, follow-up data, adverse effects, and dental treatment prior to RT were evaluated individually for descriptive analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. Risk factors were assessed using chi-square or Mann-Whitney test. The results showed that most patients were male (88.3%) in their 6th decade of life. Tumors were mostly located in the oral cavity (52.6%) and squamous cell carcinoma was the main diagnosis (94.8%). Most cases were diagnosed in advanced stages (67.9%). RT was of 2D or 3D types in 93.6% of patients. Oral adverse effects were observed in 94.7% of patients treated with RT or RT+CT. Osteoradionecrosis (ORN), oral mucositis (OM), candidiasis, and xerostomia were the main complications. Patients who received 2D RT had higher risk of developing ORN and xerostomia compared to those who received 3D RT. The risk of developing ORN was higher in smokers compared to non-smokers and in patients who had not previously consulted a dentist. This study showed that patients who underwent RT for HNC have a high occurrence of oral complications. Dentists play a key role in the management of these oral side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.