ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025
Machine learning algorithms applied to the diagnosis of COVID-19 based on epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo predict COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with SARS in a city in southern Brazil by using machine learning algorithms.
methodsThe study sample consisted of patients ≥ 18 years of age admitted to the emergency department with SARS and hospitalized in the Hospital Escola - Universidade Federal de Pelotas between March and December of 2020. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were processed by machine learning algorithms in order to identify patterns. Mean AUC values were calculated for each combination of model and oversampling/undersampling techniques during cross-validation.
resultsOf a total of 100 hospitalized patients with SARS, 78 had information for RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection and were therefore included in the analysis. Most (58%) of the patients were female, and the mean age was 61.4 ± 15.8 years. Regarding the machine learning models, the random forest model had a slightly higher median performance when compared with the other models tested and was therefore adopted. The most important features to diagnose COVID-19 were leukocyte count, PaCO2, troponin levels, duration of symptoms in days, platelet count, multimorbidity, presence of band forms, urea levels, age, and D-dimer levels, with an AUC of 87%.
conclusionsArtificial intelligence techniques represent an efficient strategy to identify patients with high clinical suspicion, particularly in situations in which health care systems face intense strain, such as in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.