ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
The relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress: a case-control study.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis research was conducted to determine the relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress.
methodsAn analytical, case-control research design was used. The study was conducted between April 2023 and March 2024. The population of the study consisted of pregnant women who presented to a training and research hospital in the north of Turkey for antenatal follow-up, and the sample consisted of 152 women from this population (case group 76 and control group 76). Data were collected using a Pregnant Descriptive Information Form, the Prenatal Attachment Inventory, and the Prenatal Distress Scale-Revised Version. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation analysis were utilized to analyze the data.
resultsThe prenatal attachment scores of participants who discovered their pregnancies late were significantly lower than the scores of those whose pregnancies were discovered early (p<0.05). The prenatal distress scores of participants whose pregnancies were discovered late were significantly higher than the scores of those with early discovery (p<0.05). While a statistically positive, low-level relationship was detected between the prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores of pregnant women whose pregnancies were discovered early (p<0.05), there was no statistically significant relationship between the scores of those who discovered their pregnancies late (p>0.05).
conclusionThere was a difference between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and prenatal distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.