Observational studyCoDAS2025
Effect of active middle ear implant on auditory speech perception in individuals with ear malformation.
Observational study in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo verify the results of active middle ear implant on audibility and auditory speech perception in individuals with external and/or middle ear malformations.
methodsPrimary, observational, retrospective study, through analysis of medical records of individuals with bilateral external and/or middle ear malformations, unilateral users of active middle ear implant. The data collected refer to auditory thresholds obtained through free-field audiometry and assessment of auditory speech perception - sentence recognition in silence and noise, in the following situations: without the implant, at the time of activation, in the first and in the third month of use.
resultsNine individuals were included in the study. The average age at the time of activation was 24.6 years (minimum 12 and maximum 40 years). Statistically significant improvement in auditory thresholds (p<0.05) and in the sentence recognition test in silence and noise (p<0.05) was observed at the time of activation. There was no significant difference between the evaluation situations after activation, indicating acclimatization by the user.
conclusionThe results of the active middle ear implant VSB (MED-EL) users on the audibility and auditory speech perception, in individual with external and/or middle ear malformation were better in the activation condition compared to the pre-surgical condition, maintaining stable over time; which reinforces its indication for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.