ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Development of a prototype instrument to assess women's culinary autonomy].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a prototype of an instrument to assess women's culinary autonomy. The conceptual model of culinary autonomy and the theoretical-methodological framework of procedural development of instruments were adopted for this. Steps involved finding empirical manifestations (expressions) of the construct of culinary autonomy and elaboration of items by a literature review, two focus groups (n = 20), a workshop with specialists (n = 25); content and item semantics validation by a panel of experts (n = 20); the evaluation of a preliminary version of the prototype (dimensional structure, semantics, and item intensity gradient) in a workshop with a specialist in instrument development; and two pre-tests (n = 30). The final version of the prototype of the culinary autonomy instrument contains 64 items and two blocks: individual knowledge, habits, and attitudes (38 items) and aspects of the household and residents' practices (26 items). A study is underway to evaluate the validity and reliability of this instrument with women from four Brazilian regions. Applying this instrument in different realities can support food and nutrition public policies as well as qualify nutritional care in the Brazilian Unified National Health System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.