Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172339›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Assessment of the potential of a laser-based device as a Rhipicephalus microplus motility inhibitor.

Leonardo Aparecido Lima Dos Santos, Velizie Caldarelli Vazquez, Yousmel Alemán Gainza, Ana Carolina de Souza Chagas, Renato Cristiano Torres, Gustavo Felippelli, Alessandro Pelegrine Minho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonardo Aparecido Lima Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.
Velizie Caldarelli VazquezPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.
Yousmel Alemán GainzaInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Rio Claro, SP, Brasil.
Ana Carolina de Souza ChagasEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.
Renato Cristiano TorresEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa, Gerência-Geral de Tecnologia da Informação, Parque Estação Biológica - PqEB, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Gustavo FelippelliFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil.
Alessandro Pelegrine MinhoEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-3202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhipicephalus microplus is an ectoparasite responsible for causing economic losses in livestock farming totalling approximately $3.24 billion dollars per year. The main control method involves the use of chemical acaricides. However, the incorrect and intensive use of these chemicals has led to an increasing number of reports of resistance to acaricides. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a laser prototype with a voltage of 5 V and power of 1000 mW to reduce the development of R. microplus. The methodology evaluated did not result in a high mortality rate; therefore, it was necessary to carry out a larval migration test. To carry out the test, 3 treatments were evaluated in triplicate (negative controls H20, 60% ethanol and positive control), with 20 larvae were evaluated for each replicate of the treatments, which resulted in an increase in the percentage of migration from 2.5% and 3.2% to above 94.9% and 93.5% in the negative controls, while in the positive control group there was no showed a significant change in migration, reaching close to 100%. This study demonstrated that physical control caused damage to ectoparasite locomotor structures and could affect the parasite's life cycle.

Indexed as

LasersRhipicephalusAnimalsLarva

Identifiers

PMID40172339
PMCPMC11961072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.