ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Effects of false vocal fold adduction and aryepiglottic sphincter narrowing on the voice source in a three-dimensional voice production model.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceiving Physiology from the Voice: Evidence for Physiological Coupling Between Laryngeal and Epilaryngeal Adjustments.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of one-dimensional glottal flow model in predicting voice production: comparison to experiments and three-dimensional flow simulations.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Vocal tract contribution to vocal intensity: Interaction between vocal fold adduction, formant tuning, and fundamental frequency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although voice production often involves false vocal fold (FVF) adduction and aryepiglottic sphincter (AES) narrowing, their effects on the voice source still remain unclear. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) compressible flow simulation coupled to a two-mass vocal fold model in a vocal tract with varying degrees of constriction at the levels of the FVF and AES is conducted. Results showed a small effect of FVF adduction and AES narrowing on the voice source except when the FVFs were strongly adducted. Strong FVF adduction reduced the glottal resistance and increased the transglottal pressure, thus strengthening the voice source. This reduction in glottal resistance is a result of the glottal jet persisting longer into the supraglottal region, which can be achieved by constricting the jet from the medial-lateral direction. In contrast, constricting the jet flow from the anterior-posterior direction had almost no influence on the source strength. In summary, the effect of the 3D supraglottal flow features on the voice source is small except for extreme FVF adduction, and the effect of epilaryngeal adduction is mainly on the vocal tract transfer function rather than the voice source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.