ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Comparative Analysis of Three Vertebral Screw Placement Directions in Anterior Thoracolumbar Fracture Surgery: A Finite Element Study.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of short- and long-term efficacy between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThoracolumbar fractures, especially burst fractures, are common severe spinal injuries requiring surgery. The main goals are to restore spinal stability and normal curvature, relieve nerve compression, and prevent further neurological damage. Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used in spinal surgery. This study aims to use finite element analysis to compare two new thoracolumbar anterior fixation systems: Hybrid cross-thoracolumbar fixation system and new hybrid cross-thoracolumbar fixation system (HXTL and NHXTL) with Medtronic's ANTERIOR system, providing a theoretical reference for surgeries.
methodA finite element model of the T12-L2 vertebrae of a 27-year-old healthy male was built based on CT images. The model was processed, optimized, meshed, and analyzed using software. In vitro biomechanical tests were compared with the finite element model results to verify the model's validity. A 500 N compressive load and a 10 N m bending moment were applied to the upper surface of T12. The stress and displacement of the vertebral body and the stress state of the support body of the two models under various conditions like forward flexion and backward extension were observed and analyzed.
resultsThe study compared the biomechanical performance of the HXTL, NHXTL, and ANTERIOR systems under six physiological conditions. The vertebral body displacement of the three systems was maximum under forward flexion. During right flexion, the HXTL displacement was significantly greater than that of the ANTERIOR and NHXTL systems, while during extension, the HXTL and NHXTL displacements were significantly less than those of the ANTERIOR system. Under other motion conditions, the displacements were relatively small. In terms of vertebral body stress, the ANTERIOR model had the maximum stress during left flexion, significantly greater than that of the other two. In terms of titanium mesh stress, the HXTL system had significantly higher stress during extension and left rotation compared to the other two systems. In terms of nail-rod stress, the ANTERIOR system had higher stress in all directions than the HXTL and NHXTL systems.
conclusionCompared with the ANTERIOR system, the HXTL system reduces the surgical incision through oblique nail placement, can reduce the risk of nail-rod failure, and increase the stability of the titanium mesh between vertebral bodies, but it also brings a higher risk of subsidence. The NHXTL model not only reduces the surgical incision and the risk of accidental injury to contralateral blood vessels but also reduces the risk of nail-rod failure and does not increase the risk of titanium mesh subsidence. It is a more optimized choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.