ArticleReproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025
Histological Studies in the Endometrium of Fertile and Subfertile Bitches.
Article in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial biopsies have been used historically as a diagnostic tool as part of breeding management in some domestic species. In the mare, the findings in an endometrial biopsy can relate to the ability of that mare to carry a pregnancy to term. The value of the endometrial biopsy in the canine has not been fully established. In this study, the presence of inflammation, fibrosis and endometrial cysts was characterised in full-thickness uterine biopsies from subfertile bitches in late diestrus/early anestrus and compared to the same findings in fertile bitches. The hypothesis was that subfertile bitches would have more inflammation, fibrosis and endometrial cysts. Full-thickness uterine biopsies were taken at the hysterotomy site at the time of C-section for control cases (n = 103), and previous submissions were collected from The Ohio State Reproductive Service as subfertile samples (n = 263). The cases were blinded, randomised and evaluated. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables between control and experimental samples. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare ages between the groups. Overall, inflammation was observed more frequently in the subfertile group in comparison to the control group. Lymphoplasmacytic inflammation was observed more frequently in the subfertile group when compared to the fertile group. The incidence of periglandular fibrosis and endometrial cysts was not significantly different between the two groups. These results indicate that microscopic evaluation of canine uterine biopsies may be more suited to detecting inflammatory changes in the endometrium and isolated endometrial cysts, as well as isolated fibrotic lesions, which may be less impactful on fertility compared to chronic inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.