ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2025
How Many Goats Does a Mannequin Cost? Community-engaged Design of Layperson First Responder Training Materials in Low-resource Settings.
Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSimulation materials for layperson first responder (LFR) trainings used in high-resource settings are prohibitively expensive for use in low- and low-middle income countries. To date, no structured approach to community-engaged design in identifying accessible and acceptable simulation materials for LFR trainings has been developed.
methodsWe conducted 2 workshops with male (18) and female participants (10) in a rural village in the Centre-Est region of Burkina Faso using principles of community-engaged research to define solutions for improvised LFR training materials.
resultsParticipants reported a range of reactions to the use of live trainees and animal models for LFR training including considerations around gender sensitivity, use of animals for training purposes in regions of food insecurity, and religious and cultural barriers to consumption of meat after use for training purposes. A range of locally available options for training materials was identified by participants.
conclusionsSignificant sociocultural variability exists across low-resource environments with implications for the acceptability and availability of improvised materials for LFR training. Affected communities should be engaged in the selection and design of improvisation strategies to ensure context-appropriate adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.