ArticleJournal of genetics2025
Generation of albino C57BL/6J mice by CRISPR embryo editing of the mouse tyrosinase locus.
Article in Journal of genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After the arrival of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology, genetic engineering of model organisms has become much faster and more efficient. The development of genetically modified mouse models is also facilitated by the application of various CRISPR methodologies. Although the very first studies utilized pronuclear injection (PNI) of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs into the zygote stage embryos to create knockout and knockin mutations, the repertoire of techniques and collection of reagents for CRISPR editing has rapidly expanded. This presents researchers in the field with a versatility of choices for genetic engineering. However, there are not many comparative studies that analysed the efficacy of gene editing when Cas9 and sgRNA/ssDNA oligos were transferred to the embryos by different methodologies. Here, we aimed to compare two different methods, electroporation and PNI. One of the recent developments gaining wide use in mouse model research is the application of electroporation for the introduction of Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes into zygote stage embryos. Here, we have used this technique to generate albino coat-coloured C57BL/6J mice by targeted inactivation of the mouse tyrosinase gene through indel or knockin mutations. We have also applied the PNI protocol with the same set of reagents, to compare the efficiency of the two techniques in generation of indel and knockin mutations. Although PNI results in signifi- cantly higher efficiency for knockin mutations, it requires specialized equipment setup and advanced training in embryo micromanipulation and microinjection. Therefore, for the generation of simple gene knockouts by indel mutations, electroporation can be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40171792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.