ArticleProteomics2025
Ethics of Personalised Medicine: Importance of the Multidisciplinary Approach in KidneySign Project.
Article in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article explores the ethical and societal issues in developing personalised medicine (PM) as part of the KidneySign project, which aims to mobilise translational big data to validate a proteomic signature of renal fibrosis with prognostic value. This research offers hope for improved management of chronic kidney disease, including diagnosis and treatment. This article examines how the human and social sciences can be mobilised within a biomedical research project to identify and prevent concomitant ethical, legal and social issues. This point of view defends a multidisciplinary approach to PM and artificial intelligence in medicine. Presenting theoretical and methodological contributions of social sciences in the case of KidneySign offers an opportunity to better understand the integration of these disciplines in biomedical research. It allows us to question the study protocol itself and to frame it through legal obligations, as well as potential legal consequences and challenges. Moreover, sociological assessments help identify key points and highlight the limits of the technophilic fantasy in the representations of patients and health professionals. The introduction of new technologies into medical research and practice requires special attention to ethics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.