ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2025
Artificial intelligence-enhanced interpretation of kidney transplant biopsy: focus on rejection.
Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathology Foundation Models: Evolution, Current Landscape, Challenges and Opportunities from a Technical and Clinical Perspective.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rejection-Focused Precision Medicine in Kidney Transplantation: Biology, Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in genitourinary pathology.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Shaping the Future of AI in Organ Transplantation: Position Paper of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Renal Allograft Pathology Classifications: Contemporary Updates and Diagnostic Utility.Cureus · 2025Review
- Can Artificial Intelligence Whole Slide Image-Based Methods Predict Kidney Function?Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Xenotransplantation: A Prioritized Roadmap for Early Clinical Translation, Opportunities and Challenges.XenotransplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe objective of this review is to provide an update on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for the histological interpretation of kidney transplant biopsies. RECENT
findingsAI, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has demonstrated great potential in accurately identifying kidney structures, detecting abnormalities, and diagnosing rejection with improved objectivity and reproducibility. Key advancements include the segmentation of kidney compartments for accurate assessment and the detection of inflammatory cells to aid in rejection classification. Development of decision support tools like the Banff Automation System and iBox for predicting long-term allograft failure have also been made possible through AI techniques. Challenges in AI implementation include the need for rigorous evaluation and validation studies, computational resource requirements and energy consumption concerns, and regulatory hurdles. Data protection regulations and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval represent such entry barriers. Future directions involve the integration of AI of histopathology with other modalities, such as clinical laboratory and molecular data. Development of more efficient CNN architectures could be possible through the exploration of self-supervised and graph neural network approaches. SUMMARY: The field is progressing towards an automated Banff Classification system, with potential for significant improvements in diagnostic processes and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.