Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171636›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2025

Artificial intelligence-enhanced interpretation of kidney transplant biopsy: focus on rejection.

Alton B Farris, Jeroen van der Laak, Dominique van Midden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Shaping the Future of AI in Organ Transplantation: Position Paper of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alton B FarrisDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jeroen van der LaakDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dominique van MiddenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

BANFF-AID: Banff Automated Nephrology Feature Framework - Artificial Intelligence DiagnosisR43DK141305 · NIDDK · KITWARE, INC. · PI CHAUDHARY, AASHISH · 2024 to 2024
$307k
NIDDK NIH HHS R43 DK141305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe objective of this review is to provide an update on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for the histological interpretation of kidney transplant biopsies. RECENT

findingsAI, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has demonstrated great potential in accurately identifying kidney structures, detecting abnormalities, and diagnosing rejection with improved objectivity and reproducibility. Key advancements include the segmentation of kidney compartments for accurate assessment and the detection of inflammatory cells to aid in rejection classification. Development of decision support tools like the Banff Automation System and iBox for predicting long-term allograft failure have also been made possible through AI techniques. Challenges in AI implementation include the need for rigorous evaluation and validation studies, computational resource requirements and energy consumption concerns, and regulatory hurdles. Data protection regulations and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval represent such entry barriers. Future directions involve the integration of AI of histopathology with other modalities, such as clinical laboratory and molecular data. Development of more efficient CNN architectures could be possible through the exploration of self-supervised and graph neural network approaches. SUMMARY: The field is progressing towards an automated Banff Classification system, with potential for significant improvements in diagnostic processes and patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGraft RejectionKidneyKidney TransplantationBiopsyGraft SurvivalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcomeartificial intelligencedigital pathologykidney biopsyrejectiontransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40171636
PMCPMC12052063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.