ReviewAnnals of human genetics2025
Opportunities and Challenges of Population Pharmacogenomics.
Review in Annals of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Association of Native American, European, and African Ancestry with CYP450 Pharmacogenetics and Metabolic Phenotypes in Admixed Latin American Populations from Ecuador and Nicaragua.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indian Journal of Psychiatry: A thriving journal from Global South looking into the horizon.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic recall study of Estonian Biobank participants with novel genetic variants in CYP2C19 and CYP2D6.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Imagining Genomics and Population Health in 2050: Anticipating Future Research, Policy, and Governance Needs.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Population Genetics of Pharmacogenetic Variants in a Greek Psychiatric Cohort of over 3000 Individuals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenomics and genetic ancestry in Colombia: a study on all variant drug annotations of PharmGKB.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacological responses can vary significantly among patients from different ethnogeographic backgrounds. This variability can, at least in part, be attributed to population-specific genetic patterns in genes involved in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, as well as in genes associated with drug-induced toxicity. Identification of such ethnogeographic variability is thus crucial for the optimization of precise population-specific drug treatments. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the clinically actionable pharmacogenetic diversity of genes involved in drug metabolism (CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, DPYD, TPMT, NUDT15, UGT1A1, and NAT2), drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HLA-A and HLA-B), and drug-induced acute hemolytic anemia (G6PD). We highlight risk populations with distinct allele frequencies and discuss implications for the customization of treatment. Subsequently, we discuss key challenges and opportunities in population pharmacogenomics, including the importance of considering distinct allele frequency patterns in indigenous or founder populations, interpreting pharmacogenomic response in admixed populations, addressing the investigation bias of the pharmacogenomic literature, and difficulties in including rare and population-specific variants into drug response predictions. The information provided here underscores the critical role of population pharmacogenomics in refining pharmacological treatment strategies and aspires to provide further guidance to maximize the benefits of precision medicine across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.