ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism-Is The Gold Standard Losing Its Luster?
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular pathology of primary aldosteronism and hypercortisolism: Impact on adrenal surgery.iScience · 2026Review
- Emerging methods for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Mass Spectrometric Measurements of 11-Deoxycortisol, Androstenedione and Dehydroepiandrosterone Are Superior to Cortisol to Assess Selectivity of Non-Stimulated Adrenal Vein Sampling.Clinical endocrinology · 2026Article
- Adrenal Aldosterone Synthase Expression Imaging in Primary Aldosteronism.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Primary aldosteronism: adrenalectomy could save more lives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The first primary aldosteronism (PA) case, documented in 1954, was attributed to a sizable aldosterone-producing adenoma, which was palpable during exploratory surgery. By the 1960s, expected aldosterone-producing adenomas in several other, equally severe PA cases escaped localization with ether radiographic modalities available at the time (aortography and retroperitoneal pneumography) or during intraoperative exploration. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) was, hence, introduced in an effort to accurately guide adrenalectomy. Computed tomography eventually became available in the 1970s, albeit with limited initial performance. Over the following decades, cross-sectional imaging underwent major advancements in spatial resolution, scanning time, and manufacturing capacity, broadening its use at a global scale. Nevertheless, AVS has remained the most trusted modality for identifying PA cases that could benefit from surgery. This clinical practice standard has been anchored in 2 major arguments: (1) a rising detection of nonfunctional incidentalomas and (2) histological documentation of millimetric sources of clinically overt PA. Numerous limitations of AVS (an invasive, costly, and technically challenging procedure, with scarce availability) have driven efforts to develop alternative modalities to localize PA sources. In addition, growing understanding of PA pathophysiology has challenged the gold-standard status of AVS for PA subtyping. This perspective discusses the evolving role of AVS in contemporary PA management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.