ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Toxicological insights and safety considerations of vorasidenib in grade 2 astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vorasidenib, a dual inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2), has shown promise as a therapeutic agent following its recent FDA approval for the treatment of grade 2 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas harboring IDH mutations in patients 12 years of age and older following surgery. While Vorasidenib offers significant potential in targeting altered metabolic pathways in low-grade gliomas, its comprehensive toxicologic and safety profile has not been adequately explored. This research letter addresses this critical gap by presenting an in silico analysis of the potential toxicologic effects of Vorasidenib. Using computational tools - ADMETlab 3.0, FAF-Drugs 4.1, DeepPK, vNN-ADMET, Pred-hERG 5.0, ADVERPred, PreADMET, and ADMET-AI - and databases such as ChEMBL, PubChem, and ChemSpider, we evaluated the key physicochemical properties and predicted ADMET profiles of Vorasidenib, along with a comparative analysis of two other drugs, namely Ivosidenib and Enasidenib. Our results suggest potential risks associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and hepatotoxicity, with structural properties indicative of hepatocellular damage during and after treatment. The low clearance rates associated with the low maximum recommended dose suggest that Vorasidenib may accumulate in the bloodstream over time, increasing the likelihood of toxic reactions. In addition, the predictive models indicate concerns for neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and cardiotoxicity, including potential blockade of hERG channels leading to QT interval prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias. Importantly, the analysis also indicates risks of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, raising concerns about promoting additional tumor formation in patients already prone to malignancies. These results emphasize the need for further preclinical and clinical studies to validate the safety of Vorasidenib. A comprehensive understanding of the toxicologic profile is critical to ensure that the therapeutic benefit for patients with IDH1/2-mutated low-grade gliomas is not compromised by potential adverse effects. Careful monitoring of patients and tailored therapeutic strategies are essential to optimize clinical outcomes and guide physicians in the safe use of Vorasidenib in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.