ArticleSAGE open nursing
Impact of Educational Guidelines on Radiotherapy Side Effects and Lifestyle in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer globally, with treatment often involving radiotherapy, which can significantly affect patients' quality of life and lifestyle. Patient education is crucial in managing the side effects of radiotherapy and improving outcomes. Aim: This study aims to assess the effect of implementing educational guidelines on radiotherapy side effects on the lifestyle and quality of life of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Method: A one-group pre- and posttest quasiexperimental design was utilized for this study, which was conducted at the radiation therapy outpatient clinic and the Clinical Oncology Department. A purposive sampling method was used to select 100 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer who were undergoing radiotherapy. Data collection involved a structured questionnaire that captured patient characteristics, medical history, the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile, and the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in both the quality of life and lifestyle of the patients after the intervention. Nearly two-thirds of patients had a low quality of life preintervention, which reduced to one-fifth postintervention ( Conclusion: The study concluded that implementing educational guidelines on radiotherapy side effects can significantly enhance the lifestyle and quality of life of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. However, the study's limitations, including the lack of a control group and reliance on self-reported data, suggest the need for further research with more robust designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.