ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2025
Lag Screw Design Is a Predictor for Cut-Out Complication After Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment in Elderly. A Comparative Analysis.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of mortality following intertrochanteric fractures, comorbidities versus reduction quality: retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Independent Risk Factors for Lag Screw Cut-Out: The Role of Open Reduction in Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation With the Proximal Femoral Nail.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Inferior Screw Referenced Calcar Tip Apex Distance as the Most Accurate Predictor of Mechanical Cut Out in Dual-Screw Proximal Femoral Nails.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of femoral neck system and cannulated cancellous screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.