Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Stepping toward implementation using co-design: development of hospital protocols and resources for using wearable activity trackers in a hospital service.

Kimberley Szeto, Aaron Davis, John Arnold, Ian Gwilt, Aislin Forrest, Isaac Heyne, Anthony Hewitt, Peter Diestel-Feddersen, Dominique Edwards, Ben Singh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kimberley SzetoAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Aaron DavisAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
John ArnoldAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ian GwiltAustralian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environments (IVE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Aislin ForrestAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Isaac HeyneAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Anthony HewittDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter Diestel-FeddersenDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dominique EdwardsDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ben SinghAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Carol MaherAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Low levels of patient physical activity during a hospital stay are linked to a variety of poor outcomes. Wearable activity trackers can help to boost patient activity and improve other outcomes during a hospitalisation, but a range of implementation barriers exist. Co-design research methodologies provide opportunities to bridge evidence-practice gaps, such as the implementation of wearable activity trackers to promote patient activity, by developing solutions and strategies in collaboration with key stakeholders. This co-design study aimed to develop a protocol and resources to support the implementation of wearable activity trackers into a rehabilitation service at a South Australian hospital. Methods: Three co-design workshops that employed an involvement partnership with 26 rehabilitation clinicians were conducted. User journey storyboards, empathy maps, and world café activities were used to understand processes of using technology with patients in the hospital, identify protocol components for using WATs, and create resources to support its implementation. Results: Using a co-design approach, this study developed a protocol for using WATs in a hospital rehabilitation services, identified key themes underpinning its implementation, and created a set of resources to support its delivery. Discussion: This study identified key elements to support implementation of WATs in hospital rehabilitation, and expands the evidence base for using co-design approaches in health research, and may support WAT implementation in other settings.

Indexed as

co-designdigital healthhealthcarehospitalphysical activityrehabilitationwearable activity tracker

Identifiers

PMID40171528
PMCPMC11959083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.