Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171514›Full record

ArticlePortuguese journal of public health2025

Assessing Cancer Knowledge among Health Students in Portugal.

Ana Barros, Madalena Pereiro, Rita Espanha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Portuguese journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana BarrosSociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Madalena PereiroIscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rita EspanhaIscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide and its incidence has been increasing. It is estimated that almost half of all cancer cases could be prevented by lifestyles changes. Cancer knowledge may be key to addressing this growing trend. This study focused on health students and its primary objective was to evaluate students' knowledge and perceptions about cancer. Methods: In this study, the tool "Students Knowledge and Perceptions about Cancer" was used to retrieve quantitative data about students' knowledge. Their perceptions were evaluated using a Likert scale that ranged from "Don't know" to "Know almost everything." This tool was shared on LinkedIn and Facebook, making the sampling method non-probabilistic. Results and Discussion: From a sample of 170 health students, 72.4% (123) got more than half of the questions right. Lung cancer is the topic with lower knowledge. Overall, there seems to be a positive statistically significant correlation between students' knowledge and their perceptions about their knowledge (

Indexed as

Cancer knowledgeCancer literacyHealth students

Identifiers

PMID40171514
PMCPMC11957474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.