ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024
Real world outcomes in alveolar soft part sarcomas: experience with an ultra-rare sarcoma from a tertiary care centre in North India.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment outcomes of sunitinib and/or pazopanib in advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma: A Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, indolent soft tissue sarcoma, with a high predilection for systemic dissemination. This study aims to elucidate the patterns of clinical presentation of ASPS and their treatment outcomes, with emphasis on the use of newer therapeutic agents and their efficacy in advanced ASPS. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort that included patients with ASPS treated at our institute between 2016 and 2023. Clinicopathological data were obtained from case records and analysed to assess outcomes. Results: The study included 34 patients (19 males, 15 females) with a median age of 28 (3-72) years. 7 patients presented with localised disease, and 27 with metastatic disease. The most common site of primary was the extremities (73%), and the most common sites of metastasis included the lungs (82%) and bones (21%). Brain metastasis was seen in 7 patients at baseline (25.9%). 90% of patients with metastatic disease received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the first-line setting with a median progression-free survival of 12 months. The median overall survival in this subset was 36 months. 7 patients with the advanced disease received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (3-atezolizumab, 4-nivolumab); 2 patients on atezolizumab and 1 on nivolumab continue to be progression free at 20,15 and 52 months, respectively. Patients with brain metastasis were seen to have markedly poor outcomes. Conclusion: The use of anti-angiogenic agents and ICIs has significantly improved survival in patients with advanced ASPS. Brain metastasis confers poor survival in these patients despite the use of newer agents. This study represents the largest cohort of patients with advanced ASPS from this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.