ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Recreational noise induced hearing loss: South African undergraduate students' perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Patterns, and Predictors of Hearing Handicap in Relation to Personal Listening Device Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tertiary music students' hearing health behaviors: ignorance is not bliss.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Hearing healthcare for all? Investigating accessibility of public audiology services in Johannesburg, South Africa.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring the Awareness of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Headphone Use: A Cross-Sectional Study Integrating the Health Belief Model and COM-B Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Bridging the Knowledge-Behaviour Gap in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Why Awareness Campaigns Are Not Enough.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recreational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an increasing public health concern among young adults who frequently use personal listening devices (PLDs) at high volumes for extended periods. Despite this, awareness of NIHL risks remains low, particularly among university students in South Africa. Objective: This study aimed to assess undergraduate students' awareness of recreational NIHL, examining their earphone use habits, volume preferences, preventive behaviors, and associations between demographic variables and NIHL awareness. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 154 undergraduate students at a large urban South African university. Quantitative data on listening habits, NIHL awareness, and preventive behaviors were collected and analysed using descriptive including thematic analysis and inferential statistics such as Chi-square tests to examine associations between variables. Results: Most participants (67.5%) reported daily earphone use, often at moderate (48.1%) or high (33.8%) volumes. Awareness of NIHL was low, with only 9.7% of students feeling very informed. Inferential analysis revealed significant associations between NIHL awareness and age ( Conclusion: The findings highlight a high prevalence of potentially unsafe listening behaviors and low NIHL awareness among South African university students. Recommendations include university-based hearing health programs, leveraging social media for outreach, integrating education into first-year curricula, and promoting affordable protective options, and social media campaigns targeting safe listening practices. These measures could help foster safer listening habits and reduce NIHL risk within this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.