ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
A review of national public health strategies in selected countries.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National public health strategies play an essential role in defining a country's vision, policy direction and approaches for ensuring the health of its population. Gaining an understanding of the public health issues which countries prioritize, and how these health issues are improved upon, may provide insights into effective methods of national public health strategy development and delivery. National public health strategies were identified for ten countries and a descriptive analysis of strategy contents and development was undertaken. All of the identified national public health strategies included an overall aim of improving health and wellbeing, and all strategy scopes extended beyond the health domain. Themes or priorities frequently identified included promoting healthy living or behaviors, the strengthening of public health, and equity or equality. Approaches to strategy implementation were considered to be prescriptive or interpretive, with prescriptive approaches including detailed implementation plans with specific actions and key performance indicators, and interpretive approaches including high-level strategic actions along with principles to support their implementation. National public health strategy development was informed by both evidence and engagement with stakeholders, including the public, experts, and representatives from governmental and non-governmental organizations at local, regional and national levels. Overall, while the information gained in this analysis assists in the development of a national public health strategy, variation observed across the included strategies indicates that consideration should be given to factors which vary from country to country. These factors include the national health profile, the political context, underpinning and associated policies, and the availability of resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.