ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Analysis of sounds made by
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perinatal physiology and welfare in water buffalo: calving, mother-calf bonding, lactation, and postpartum disorders.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Big data approaches to bovine bioacoustics: a FAIR-compliant dataset and scalable ML framework for precision livestock welfare.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Audio and video recording techniques have advanced significantly in recent years, allowing newer opportunities for sound analysis. The grouping of cattle breeds or individuals based on the connections between their behavior and condition and their vocalizations is important from the point of view of animal welfare. Despite the numerous studies published about the acoustic characteristics of such sounds, there has not been an acoustic analysis regarding of cattle behavior and condition in isolation. The grey cattle and domestic buffalo cows, separated from their calves for a few minutes, are stressed and vocalize orally. In this study various methods were employed for the analysis of the sounds that water buffalo and grey cattle made after weaning. Differences have been found between the two species, but not between individuals. Their pitch varies over time for both species. The buffalo voice is three times more dynamic than that of the grey cattle on a logHz scale. Furthermore, a significant difference was found between relevant mel frequency cepstral coefficients adapted to animals. Our findings may be utilized in agriculture and bioacoustic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.