Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171404›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Testing an inverse modeling approach with gradient boosting regression for stroke volume estimation using patient thermodilution data.

Vasiliki Vicky Bikia, Dionysios Adamopoulos, Marco Roffi, Georgios Rovas, Stéphane Noble, François Mach, Nikolaos Stergiopulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vasiliki Vicky BikiaLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dionysios AdamopoulosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marco RoffiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Georgios RovasLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane NobleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
François MachDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nikolaos StergiopulosLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke volume (SV) is a major indicator of cardiovascular function, providing essential information about heart performance and blood flow adequacy. Accurate SV measurement is particularly important for assessing patients with heart failure, managing patients undergoing major surgeries, and delivering optimal care in critical settings. Traditional methods for estimating SV, such as thermodilution, are invasive and unsuitable for routine diagnostics. Non-invasive techniques, although safer and more accessible, often lack the precision and user-friendliness needed for continuous bedside monitoring. We developed a modified method for SV estimation that combines a validated 1-D model of the systemic circulation with machine learning. Our approach replaces the traditional optimization process developed in our previous work, with a regression method, utilizing an in silico-generated dataset of various hemodynamic profiles to create a gradient boosting regression-enabled SV estimator. This dataset accurately mimics the dynamic characteristics of the 1-D model, allowing for precise SV predictions without resource-intensive parameter adjustments. We evaluated our method against SV values derived from the gold standard thermodilution method in 24 patients. The results demonstrated that our approach provides a satisfactory agreement between the predicted and reference data, with a MAE of 16 mL, a normalized RMSE of 21%, a bias of -9.2 mL, and limits of agreement (LoA) of [-47, 28] mL. A correlation coefficient of

Indexed as

blood pressurecardiac outputgradient boostinghemodynamicsnon-invasive monitoringsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40171404
PMCPMC11959070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.