Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171376›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Stainless Steel Versus Titanium Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Comparative Study.

Saloni Bharti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saloni BhartiDentistry, Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The fast-paced lifestyle of modern society has led to an increase in maxillofacial trauma, particularly in the mandible, which is prone to fracture due to its prominent position among facial bones. Mandibular fractures are one of the most common facial injuries and require effective treatment to ensure proper healing and function. A study conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital investigated the adaptability, impact on fracture line difficulties, and facial outcomes of fracture therapy using stainless steel and titanium miniplates. The research aimed to compare these two materials in terms of their effectiveness, patient outcomes, and any complications that might arise from their use. Methodology The study included 20 adult patients with mandibular fractures, divided into two groups for open reduction and internal fixation using either titanium or stainless steel miniplates. All patients underwent comprehensive diagnostics, including blood tests and virus screenings, prior to the operation to ensure they were suitable candidates for surgery. The surgical procedure was followed by a meticulous postoperative care plan, which included a soft diet to minimize strain on the jaw, chlorhexidine mouth rinse to maintain oral hygiene, and guided elastics to support proper alignment during healing. The study meticulously recorded the operating times, fracture stability, and any complications to provide a thorough comparison between the two materials. Results The results showed that patients in the titanium miniplate group had significantly shorter operating times, averaging 32 minutes compared to 45.10 minutes in the stainless steel group (p < 0.0001). This difference highlights the efficiency of titanium plates in surgical procedures. Additionally, using a bimanual examination to assess fracture stability, the titanium plate group exhibited superior stability compared to the stainless steel plate group. The stability of the fractured segments in the titanium group was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.474. Conclusion Titanium miniplates provide several advantages over stainless steel in the treatment of mandibular fractures. These advantages include increased postoperative stability, lower complication rates, and higher biocompatibility. The study concludes that titanium miniplates are a more effective option for mandibular fracture treatment, offering better patient outcomes and reducing the overall burden on healthcare resources. This finding is significant for oral and maxillofacial surgery, as it supports the use of titanium miniplates for improved surgical results and patient care.

Indexed as

intermaxillary fixation (imf)mandibular fracturemaxillomandibular fixation (mmf)open reduction and internal fixation (orif)stainless steeltitanium miniplates

Identifiers

PMID40171376
PMCPMC11961020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.