ArticleCureus2025
Stainless Steel Versus Titanium Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The fast-paced lifestyle of modern society has led to an increase in maxillofacial trauma, particularly in the mandible, which is prone to fracture due to its prominent position among facial bones. Mandibular fractures are one of the most common facial injuries and require effective treatment to ensure proper healing and function. A study conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital investigated the adaptability, impact on fracture line difficulties, and facial outcomes of fracture therapy using stainless steel and titanium miniplates. The research aimed to compare these two materials in terms of their effectiveness, patient outcomes, and any complications that might arise from their use. Methodology The study included 20 adult patients with mandibular fractures, divided into two groups for open reduction and internal fixation using either titanium or stainless steel miniplates. All patients underwent comprehensive diagnostics, including blood tests and virus screenings, prior to the operation to ensure they were suitable candidates for surgery. The surgical procedure was followed by a meticulous postoperative care plan, which included a soft diet to minimize strain on the jaw, chlorhexidine mouth rinse to maintain oral hygiene, and guided elastics to support proper alignment during healing. The study meticulously recorded the operating times, fracture stability, and any complications to provide a thorough comparison between the two materials. Results The results showed that patients in the titanium miniplate group had significantly shorter operating times, averaging 32 minutes compared to 45.10 minutes in the stainless steel group (p < 0.0001). This difference highlights the efficiency of titanium plates in surgical procedures. Additionally, using a bimanual examination to assess fracture stability, the titanium plate group exhibited superior stability compared to the stainless steel plate group. The stability of the fractured segments in the titanium group was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.474. Conclusion Titanium miniplates provide several advantages over stainless steel in the treatment of mandibular fractures. These advantages include increased postoperative stability, lower complication rates, and higher biocompatibility. The study concludes that titanium miniplates are a more effective option for mandibular fracture treatment, offering better patient outcomes and reducing the overall burden on healthcare resources. This finding is significant for oral and maxillofacial surgery, as it supports the use of titanium miniplates for improved surgical results and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.