ArticleCureus2025
Families' Experiences of Surrogate Decision-Making and Challenges of Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lonely boats swaying in the storm: experiences and supportive needs of adult only-children confronting parental end-of-life care: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Families' Experiences of Surrogate Decision-Making and Challenges of Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFamily members who make surrogate decisions tend to be emotionally burdened and may have difficulty making decisions that fit the patient's wishes. It is unclear what support family members making surrogate decisions expect from health professionals. This study aims to clarify the information needed for surrogate decision-making and the support needs of healthcare professionals.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used questionnaires. Family members with experience in making surrogate decisions for treatments that affected the patient's life and prognosis were included. Participants were recruited using an online panel through a private research company in Japan. For the survey items, 60 participants were asked to specify one case in which they made a surrogate decision and describe the resources they used to support their decision-making. In addition, participants were assessed on a 10-point scale to determine their sense of satisfaction with the decision, whether the decision was per the patient's wishes, and their level of emotional burden. Knowledge and understanding of life-sustaining treatments were also investigated.
resultsFamily members tended to make decisions that were more aligned with the patient's desires than with theirs (P = 0.005). In addition, decisions that prioritized the patient's desires tended to result in higher levels of satisfaction after the decision was made (r = 0.349, P < 0.01). Family members who understood the treatment being given to the patient tended to experience lower psychological stress after the decision was made (r = -0.394, P < 0.01). The information that families considered important for making decisions on the patient's behalf included whether the patient would regain consciousness (70%) and the patient's age (66.7%).
conclusionThe findings suggest that medical professionals should encourage family members to make decisions in keeping with the patient's wishes and provide the patient's information, including risk information, to help them understand the treatment. In addition, considering the mental stress and burden on family members, it is necessary to consider the process of discussion among family members while providing mental support to facilitate the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.