Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171361›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence for General Surgeons: A Narrative Review.

Blanche Lee, Nikhil Narsey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Education: Applications, Ethics, and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Blanche LeeGeneral Surgery, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba City, AUS.
Nikhil NarseyGeneral Surgery, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba City, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly progressed in the last decade and will inevitably become incorporated into trauma and surgical systems. In such settings, surgeons often need to make high-stakes, time-sensitive, and complex decisions with limited or uncertain information. AI has great potential to augment the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative phases of trauma care. Despite the expeditious advancement of AI, many surgeons lack a foundational understanding of AI terminology, its processes, and potential applications in clinical practice. This narrative review aims to educate general surgeons about the basics of AI, highlight its applications in thoraco-abdominal trauma, and discuss the implications of incorporating its use into the Australian health care system. This review found that studies of AI in trauma care have predominantly focused on machine learning and deep learning applied to diagnostics, risk prediction, and decision-making. Other subfields of AI include natural language processing and computer vision. While AI tools have many potential applications in trauma care, current clinical use is limited. Future prospective, locally validated research is required prior to incorporating AI into clinical practice.

Indexed as

acute trauma careartificial intelligence in surgerycomputer visiondeep learning artificial intelligencemachine learning modelsnatural language processing (nlp)

Identifiers

PMID40171361
PMCPMC11958818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.