ReviewCureus2025
Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Epidemiology, Biomechanics, and Risk Factors.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medial tibial stress syndrome.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, Work-Up, and Management of Common Track and Field Injuries.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regular physical activity confers numerous health and social benefits; however, activity-related lower-limb overuse injuries are prevalent. Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a common overuse injury of the lower extremity. It is frequently observed in athletes and in military personnel. It involves exercise-induced pain over the anterior tibia and is an early stress injury in the continuum of tibial stress fractures (TSF). This scoping review aims to synthesize and characterize the literature on MTSS, identify knowledge gaps, and propose future research directions. We conducted a scoping review of the literature, which was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Arksey and O'Malley methodology, by searching four databases until December 31, 2023. The references were screened by two authors based on their titles, abstracts, and full texts to ensure that they met the inclusion criteria. Data related to the research objectives were extracted, analyzed, and reported numerically and descriptively. Thirty-seven studies were included in the current review, most of which recruited athletes as the study participants (67.6%). This was followed by articles about military members (16.2%). The highest prevalence of MTSS has been reported among recreational marathon runners in India (69.5%). The highest incidence of MTSS was reported in a German study (35.7%). Two studies reported that participants with MTSS had a higher body mass index (BMI) than those without MTSS, and one study found a significant correlation between BMI and the time required for complete recovery. Two studies reported that individuals with greater experience in athletic activities were at a lower risk of developing MTSS later in their careers. In contrast, another study reported that ultramarathon running increases the incidence of MTSS overuse injuries. Traction theory as a cause of MTSS was examined in five studies, and the mean navicular drop test (NDT) score was assessed in three studies. Biomechanical evaluation of ankle disorders and MTSS was performed in five articles and hip abnormalities in four articles. This review identifies research areas on the influence of epidemiological, risk, and biomechanical factors on MTSS development. Such research could inform counseling for patients concerned about MTSS risk factors and curative measures, as well as optimize surveillance and subsequent management of MTSS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.