ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for Emergency Medical Services.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tools to predict imminent risk of patient perpetrated workplace violence in healthcare settings: an umbrella review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Reducing workplace violence in emergency medical services: a Finnish Delphi study to develop prevention guidelines.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring violence towards EMS personnel: a multiprofessional qualitative study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised for Ambulance Services (SOAS-RA).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Characteristics of 9-1-1 Calls Associated with an Increased Risk of Violence Against Paramedics in a Single Canadian Site.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are at risk of on-the-job violence that can result in serious injuries. A majority of such violence is associated with underlying behavioral health emergencies. However, no simple screening tools have been validated for use in prehospital settings. This study aimed to examine the utility of the 7-item Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for Emergency Departments (ABRAT-ED) modified for prehospital settings in identifying patients at risk for violence. Methods: This prospective study included adult and pediatric patients aged ≥10 years transported by 2 private EMS agencies between March 11 and April 21, 2024. EMS clinicians completed the modified ABRAT-ED before initiating transport and captured any subsequent physical assault, physical threat, or sexual harassment using the Violent Event Severity Tool. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed. Results: Of 11,292 EMS dispatches, 9,024 patients were evaluable, and 105 had ≥1 violent event (1.16 %). The logistic regression model resulted in a 3-item ABRAT-EMS, including agitation, confusion, and aggressive/threatening behaviors. ROC analysis showed the area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94; Conclusion: The ABRAT-EMS is a brief 3-item checklist with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for identifying potentially violent patients during EMS encounters. The use of ABRAT-EMS can help EMS clinicians identify potentially violent patients and allow the implementation of proactive, targeted violence prevention measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.