Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171321›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025

The Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in a Case of Suspected Septic Distributive Shock: A Case Report.

Peter Hilbert-Carius, Astrit Heiser, Hermann Wrigge, Pia Hölbing, Patrick Schröter, Philipp Kobbe, Axel Großstück

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter Hilbert-CariusDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Astrit HeiserDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hermann WriggeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Pia HölbingDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Burn Unit, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Patrick SchröterDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Philipp KobbeDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
Axel GroßstückDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Trauma Centre Bergmannstrost Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is mainly used in patients with major noncompressible torso hemorrhage and more recently as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure during chest compressions. The use of partial REBOA as a resuscitative adjunct in distributive shock like septic or anaphylactic shock is not a current indication of its use. Nevertheless, the use of partial REBOA for the early incidence of profound distributive shock with the need for massive vasopressor support can be an option and a bridge to stabilize the patient until further treatment can be administered. We presented a case of a patient with intraoperative profound septic shock due to the release of inflammatory mediators from purulent osteomyelitis during marrow canal reaming. Due to massive vasodilatation refractory to vasopressor and fluid resuscitation, the patient needed a short period of mechanical chest compression. After REBOA placement in zone I with partial REBOA, the patient became stable, and the vasopressors could be decreased. Within the next hour, due to the use of volume resuscitation and antibiotics, the patient became more and more stable, and REBOA could slowly be deflated. With deflated REBOA still in place, the patient remained stable in the intensive care unit and infection remediation through amputation of both lower legs could be carried out on the same day. The patient was discharged home without a neurologic deficit 6 weeks later. In a situation in which fluid resuscitation and the use of vasopressor cannot stabilize the patient in distributive shock, partial REBOA might be an option to restore central perfusion until further measures can take effect. In the described case, partial REBOA proved to be effective and was able to bridge the time until definitive care was effectively undertaken.

Indexed as

aortic occlusionCPRdistributive shockosteomyelitisresuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)vasopressor

Identifiers

PMID40171321
PMCPMC11957487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.