ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
The Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in a Case of Suspected Septic Distributive Shock: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is mainly used in patients with major noncompressible torso hemorrhage and more recently as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure during chest compressions. The use of partial REBOA as a resuscitative adjunct in distributive shock like septic or anaphylactic shock is not a current indication of its use. Nevertheless, the use of partial REBOA for the early incidence of profound distributive shock with the need for massive vasopressor support can be an option and a bridge to stabilize the patient until further treatment can be administered. We presented a case of a patient with intraoperative profound septic shock due to the release of inflammatory mediators from purulent osteomyelitis during marrow canal reaming. Due to massive vasodilatation refractory to vasopressor and fluid resuscitation, the patient needed a short period of mechanical chest compression. After REBOA placement in zone I with partial REBOA, the patient became stable, and the vasopressors could be decreased. Within the next hour, due to the use of volume resuscitation and antibiotics, the patient became more and more stable, and REBOA could slowly be deflated. With deflated REBOA still in place, the patient remained stable in the intensive care unit and infection remediation through amputation of both lower legs could be carried out on the same day. The patient was discharged home without a neurologic deficit 6 weeks later. In a situation in which fluid resuscitation and the use of vasopressor cannot stabilize the patient in distributive shock, partial REBOA might be an option to restore central perfusion until further measures can take effect. In the described case, partial REBOA proved to be effective and was able to bridge the time until definitive care was effectively undertaken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.