Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171303›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Knowledge graph and its application in the study of neurological and mental disorders.

Qizheng Wang, Fan Yang, Lijie Quan, Mengjie Fu, Zhongli Yang, Ju Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qizheng Wang *School of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Fan Yang *School of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Lijie QuanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Mengjie FuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Zhongli YangState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ju WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease) and mental disorders (e.g., depression and anxiety), pose huge challenges to global public health. The pathogenesis of these diseases can usually be attributed to many factors, such as genetic, environmental and socioeconomic status, which make the diagnosis and treatment of the diseases difficult. As research on the diseases advances, so does the body of medical data. The accumulation of such data provides unique opportunities for the basic and clinical study of these diseases, but the vast and diverse nature of the data also make it difficult for physicians and researchers to precisely extract the information and utilize it in their work. A powerful tool to extract the necessary knowledge from large amounts of data is knowledge graph (KG). KG, as an organized form of information, has great potential for the study neurological and mental disorders when it is paired with big data and deep learning technologies. In this study, we reviewed the application of KGs in common neurological and mental disorders in recent years. We also discussed the current state of medical knowledge graphs, highlighting the obstacles and constraints that still need to be overcome.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedepressionknowledge graphmental disordersneurological disordersParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID40171303
PMCPMC11958944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.