ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Knowledge graph and its application in the study of neurological and mental disorders.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease) and mental disorders (e.g., depression and anxiety), pose huge challenges to global public health. The pathogenesis of these diseases can usually be attributed to many factors, such as genetic, environmental and socioeconomic status, which make the diagnosis and treatment of the diseases difficult. As research on the diseases advances, so does the body of medical data. The accumulation of such data provides unique opportunities for the basic and clinical study of these diseases, but the vast and diverse nature of the data also make it difficult for physicians and researchers to precisely extract the information and utilize it in their work. A powerful tool to extract the necessary knowledge from large amounts of data is knowledge graph (KG). KG, as an organized form of information, has great potential for the study neurological and mental disorders when it is paired with big data and deep learning technologies. In this study, we reviewed the application of KGs in common neurological and mental disorders in recent years. We also discussed the current state of medical knowledge graphs, highlighting the obstacles and constraints that still need to be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.