Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171282›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Design, nanogel synthesis, anti-proliferative activity and

Ahmed K B Aljohani, Sanadelaslam S A El-Hddad, Marwa Alsulaimany, Nader A Maghrabi, Alaa M Alhammad, Mayar N Aloufi, Luai F Alahmadi, Turkiah Ali Saeedi, Yousef Yakoub Neyaz, Kurls E Anwer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ahmed K B AljohaniDepartment of Pharmacognosy & Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina 42353 Saudi Arabia.
Sanadelaslam S A El-HddadPharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Omar Almukhtar University Al Bayda 991 Libya.
Marwa AlsulaimanyDepartment of Pharmacognosy & Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina 42353 Saudi Arabia.
Nader A MaghrabiPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Alaa M AlhammadPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Mayar N AloufiPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Luai F AlahmadiPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Turkiah Ali SaeediPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Yousef Yakoub NeyazPharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Kurls E AnwerDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University Abbassia Cairo Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-8806
Nour E A Abd El-SattarDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University Abbassia Cairo Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6680-4448
Khaled El-AdlChemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Heliopolis University for Sustainable Development Cairo Egypt eladlkhaled74@yahoo.com khaled.eladl@hu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-9770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrazole derivatives 2 and 3, pyrimidine derivative 4, and their nanogels as drug delivery systems were synthesized, and their cytotoxicity against MCF-7, HCT-116, HepG2 and A549 cells was evaluated. Herein, we focused on the characterization and synthesis of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol (Cs/PVA) nanogels loaded with derivatives 2, 3 and 4. The stability of the prepared nanogels 2, 3 and 4 was elucidated by zeta potential measurements, which possessed negative values of -9.7, -1.3 and -1.6 mV, respectively. Our compounds and their nanogels were evaluated as topo-II inhibitors and DNA intercalators. The nanogel delivery system enhanced the cytotoxicity of compound 2 against the A549, HCT116, HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines by 32.06%, 28.96%, 44.32% and 50.00%, respectively. Moreover, the nanogel of compound 3 exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity against the A549, HCT116, HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines by 33.61%, 30.64%, 44.69% and 47.86%, respectively. Furthermore, the nanogel of compound 4 showed enhanced cytotoxicity against the A549, HCT116, HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines by 31.82%, 40.12%, 50.00% and 52.61%, respectively. Moreover, derivatives 2, 2 (nanogel), 3, 3 (nanogel), 4 and 4 (nanogel) exhibited good selectivity against cancer cells and reduced toxicity to VERO cells with IC

Identifiers

PMID40171282
PMCPMC11960622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.