Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public healthcare facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study.

Berhanu Semra Mulat, Amare Zewdie, Abebaw Wasie Kasahun, Molla Gashu, Adiam Nega, Tamirat Melis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Berhanu Semra MulatDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Amare ZewdieDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Abebaw Wasie KasahunDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Molla GashuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Adiam NegaDepartment of Heath System and Policy, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tamirat MelisDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality of intrapartum and newborn care is increasingly recognized internationally as a critical aspect of the unfinished maternal and newborn health agenda. Although the world has made significant progress in reducing maternal and newborn mortality, there are still far too many preventable and treatable maternal and newborn deaths globally. Poor-quality intrapartum and newborn care along with inadequate access to basic maternal and newborn healthcare services has contributed to high maternal and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is not enough evidence describing the status quality of intrapartum and newborn care in Ethiopia, specifically in the study area. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public health facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March to April 2023 among five public health facilities, and observation of health service provision was employed among 185 mothers. A consecutive random sampling method was applied. Data were collected through document review, interview, health service provision observation, and health facility audit against the standard checklist. Quality of intrapartum and newborn care was measured using standard intrapartum and newborn care criteria. Thus, good-quality care was considered if the mother and newborn scored 75% or more of the intrapartum criteria during childbirth. Data were entered, coded, and cleaned using EpiData version 4 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Descriptive summary statistics including proportions, mean, and median were computed to describe study variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with the outcome variable. Finally, adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and Result: The study revealed that the level of good quality of intrapartum and newborn care was 35.1% and 69.7%, respectively. Input quality (AOR = 4.52; 95% CI 1.31, 14.98), health workers with 5 or more years of experience (AOR = 7.23; 95% CI 1.49, 35.84), received on job training (AOR = 5.82; 95% CI 1.91, 13.61), and friendly maternal and newborn care (AOR = 6.89; 95% CI 1.34, 35.62) were significantly associated with quality of intrapartum care. Conclusion: The quality of intrapartum care is found poor in the study area. Clients are not getting intrapartum care with state-of-the-art knowledge and current clinical best practices. Input quality, the experience of healthcare providers, friendly care, and continuous training were factors associated with the quality of intrapartum care. Improving the availability of essential inputs, enhancing the performance of healthcare providers through training, and continuous objective monitoring of the standard clinical practices are crucial to ensuring the quality of intrapartum care.

Indexed as

careEthiopiaintrapartumnewbornquality

Identifiers

PMID40171276
PMCPMC11959051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.