Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40171269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Feasibility of optimal vertex size and spacing for lattice radiotherapy implementation using helical tomotherapy.

Yunji Seol, Young Kyu Lee, Byeong Jin Kim, Kyu Hye Choi, Ji Hyun Hong, Chan-Beom Park, Sun Hwa Kim, Hyeong Wook Park, Jung-Il Kim, Wonjoong Cheon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yunji Seol *Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Kyu Lee *Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeong Jin KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Hye ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chan-Beom ParkDepartment of Biomedicine & Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Hwa KimDepartment of Biomedicine & Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong Wook ParkDepartment of Medical Physics, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Il KimElectro-Medical Device Research Center, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Wonjoong CheonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Nam KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ock ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lattice radiotherapy (LRT), a type of spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), delivers high dose at specific volumes of lattice structure within the tumor to create a low valley-to-peak dose ratio (VPDR). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing SFRT using helical tomotherapy and to investigate the effects of vertex size and spacing for attaining the VPDR. Methods: A three-dimensional lattice structure with 3×3×3 vertices was designed in a cheese phantom. Vertex sizes of 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, and 2.0 cm were assessed, with spacing from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm. The prescribed dose was set to 20 Gy to the vertices in a single fraction. VPDR was calculated from dose profiles along lines connecting three vertices in the anterior-posterior (AP), lateral (LAT), and superior-inferior (SI) directions. The minimum, maximum, and mean dose for each vertex, as well as conformity, homogeneity and monitor unit (MU) analysis were also performed. Results: VPDR decreased significantly with increasing vertex size and spacing. While the AP and LAT directions showed similar VPDR values, the SI direction consistently exhibited lower VPDR values across all configurations. Vertex sizes of 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, and 2.0 cm required spacing of at least 3.0 cm, 2.0 cm, and 1.0 cm, respectively, to achieve VPDR values below 0.4. The conformity indices ranged from 1.0 to 4.02, and the homogeneity indices ranged from 1.20 to 1.57 across all configurations. Additionally, the MUs increased with both vertex size and spacing. Conclusions: This study quantitatively analyzed the impact of various vertex sizes and spacings on VPDR in lattice radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy. VPDR decreased with increasing vertex size and spacing, with consistently lower values in the SI direction. These findings provide crucial insights for optimizing LRT plans. The identified relationships between the parameters and VPDR offer a foundation for developing more effective LRT protocols in helical tomotherapy, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

helical tomotherapylattice radiotherapyspatially fractionated radiotherapyvalley-to-peak dose ratiovertex

Identifiers

PMID40171269
PMCPMC11959701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.