ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Morphological analysis of the windlass mechanism during running.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of metatarsal bar and heel lift on foot biomechanics during gait: implications for performance-related biomechanics.Journal of physical therapy science · 2026Article
- Acute Effects of Forefoot Wedges on Concentric Power Output During Loaded Back Squats in Elite Female Handball Players: A Randomized Crossover Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular Activation Patterns in Response to Windlass Stimulation and Biofeedback: A Surface EMG Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To perform a morphological analysis of the foot windlass mechanism during running and compare it with previous studies. [Participants and Methods] Twenty healthy adults (14 males and six females) participated in this study. A VICON 3D motion-analysis device was used and the analysis used the medial longitudinal arch height model in addition to the full plug-in model. The medial longitudinal arch height, ankle joint internal plantar flexion moment, ankle joint angle, and movement of the center of gravity were measured. The focus was on running cycle synchrony and changes in the medial longitudinal arch height. A one-way analysis of variance for multiple comparisons was performed. [Results] The peak running cycles were 50.5% ± 0.6% for the ankle dorsiflexion angle, 54.4% ± 0.7% for the ankle moment, and 59.5% ± 1.7% for the medial longitudinal arch height, which were significantly different. The medial longitudinal arch showed a reverse windlass phenomenon, with a minimum of 17.1 mm at an approximately 60% running cycle and then a spike-like phenomenon of 29.1 mm at a 98% running cycle. [Conclusion] We did not observe synchronicity of any parameter, such as that observed during walking. The spike phenomenon that occurred during the 98% running cycle was the original windlass mechanism, which caused the push-off phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.