ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Assessing limb-specific reliability in body composition: a study on minimal detectable change using bioimpedance analysis.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Values of Tissue Fluid Accumulation Using Tissue Dielectric Constant and Bioimpedance Analysis in Healthy Volunteers.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Applications of bioimpedance measurement in clinical and allied fields: a comprehensive review.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] We aimed to assess the reliability of body composition measurements for individual limbs using a bioimpedance analyzer, with a focus on determining the minimal detectable change for each site. [Participants and Methods] This study included 55 healthy Japanese university students (28 men and 27 women). Each participant underwent two measurements using an InBody S10 body composition analyzer. Intraclass correlation coefficients and minimal detectable change values were calculated for muscle mass, water content, and phase angle at various limb sites. [Results] Muscle mass and water content measurements demonstrated high reliability across all limb sites, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.996 to 0.998. Phase angle measurements also showed high reliability for the limbs, with values ranging from 0.936-0.975; however, reliability was lower for the trunk, with a value of 0.854. The minimal detectable change values indicated that detecting differences in trunk phase angle required a larger change than that required for limb sites. [Conclusion] Limb-specific measurements of body composition were highly reliable, showing stable and consistent muscle mass and water content. However, the low reliability of trunk phase angle measurements suggests that factors affecting trunk measurements warrant further exploration for accurate assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.